Critical Assessment of my Peers Pt. 2

PGAKreation

Much like the first critical assessment of my peers’ work with their digital artefact pitches, I attempted to provide feedback that would be encouraging as well as critical of their beta presentations. In my critiques, I aimed to be as helpful as possible so that I could hopefully further and widen the perspectives of my peers in order to for them to achieve more in-depth findings.

The DA topics that Jack and Saxon are researching are fundamentally very similar. Micro-transactions (Jack) and Loot boxes (Saxon) go hand in hand when it comes to the criticism that members of the gaming community provide. With both of their DA’s, I felt like they would both benefit from broadening their perspectives as a means of achieving contextual information of the specific topics they are researching. While the information they provided was great and informative, they lacked depth when it comes to a critical…

View original post 296 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s